The first and only TAVR system FDA-approved
for aortic regurgitation

Watch the full late-breaking
presentation from TCT

Watch the Presentation
96.7%
Technical success1
Compared to 73% with off-label TAVR devices2
(n=180)
2.2%
Valve embolization1
Compared to 15% with off-label TAVR devices2
(n=180)
0.0%
Moderate paravalvular regurgitation at 1 year1
Compared to 10% with off-label TAVR devices2,*
(n=141)
95.0%
Technical success1
Compared to 73% with off-label TAVR devices2
(n=700)
1.3%
Valve embolization1
Compared to 15% with off-label TAVR devices2
(n=700)
0.0%
Moderate paravalvular regurgitation at 1 year1
Compared to 10% with off-label TAVR devices2,*
(n=360)
In the ALIGN-AR Trial, the Trilogy THV System met prespecified non-inferiority endpoints for both safety and efficacy in high-risk patients,1 allowing the Trilogy System to be the first and only THV FDA-approved for patients with symptomatic, severe aortic regurgitation.
01

Primary 30-day safety endpoint met

The Trilogy valve met a prespecified non-inferiority performance goal based on historical data (p < 0.0001).

Variable Pivotal
(n=180)
Pivotal + CAP
(n=700)
All Cause Mortality 2.2% 1.6%
Stroke 2.2% 1.7%
Major Life-Threatening Bleeding 4.4% 2.7%
Acute Kidney Injury Stage 2 or 3 (7 Days) 1.1% 0.7%
Major Vascular Complication 3.9% 2.4%
Surgery, Intervention, or Major Vascular Complication Related to Device or Procedure 2.8% 3.0%
New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation※§ 24.0% 21.6%
Moderate or Severe Total Aortic Regurgitation 0.6% 0.5%
Total 26.7% 27.0%
02

Primary 1-year efficacy endpoint met

Untreated severe, symptomatic aortic regurgitation is associated with high mortality. The Trilogy valve met a prespecified non-inferiority performance goal comparing treatment with Trilogy TAVR to conservative management (p < 0.0001).

0%
all-cause mortality at 1 year Pivotal
(n=180)
vs
0%
all-cause mortality at 1 year Pivotal + CAP
(n=500)
03

Lower rates of new pacemaker observed toward the end of the trial

New pacemaker rates decreased with changes to procedural technique, sizing, and management of periprocedural conduction abnormalities.

Graph showing lower rates of new pacemaker observed toward the end of the trial
Graph showing lower rates of new pacemaker observed toward the end of the trial
04

Sustained low rates of paravalvular regurgitation at 2 years

Residual aortic regurgitation is a common complication of off-label use of TAVR devices to treat AR.3 After Trilogy TAVR, significant aortic regurgitation was eliminated in all patients.

Graph showing elimination of aortic regurgitation after Trilogy TAVR
05

Excellent hemodynamic valve performance

Low single-digit transvalvular gradients and large EOAs observed after Trilogy TAVR.

Graph showing hemodynamic valve performance
06

Significant left ventricular remodeling and reduction in LV mass after Trilogy TAVR

Left ventricular dilation is seen in patients with aortic regurgitation. After Trilogy TAVR, patients experienced significant improvements in LV remodeling.
Graph showing patients experienced significant improvements in LV remodeling after Trilogy TAVR
Graph showing patients experienced significant improvements in LV remodeling after Trilogy TAVR
07

Sustained improvements in quality of life after Trilogy TAVR

At 1 year, patients experienced improvements in functional status with 92% in NYHA I/II, compared to 68% of patients in NYHA III/IV at baseline.

Graph showing sustained improvements in quality of life after Trilogy TAVR

Watch the full late-breaking
presentation from TCT

2023 TCT Vinod Thourani
2024 TCT Torsten Vahl
2025 London Valves Raj Makkar

Please complete the contact form to download the ALIGN-AR Study presentation slides








    *Required

    1. Vahl TP, et al. Lancet. 2024;403-1451-1459.

    2. Poletti E, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17:1597-1606.

    3. Haddad A et al., Clinical Cardiology 2019;42:159-166.

    *at the end of the procedure

    Composite of 30 day all-cause mortality, all stroke, life-threatening/major bleeding, major vascular complications, AKI ≥ 2 or dialysis, valve intervention, new permanent pacemaker, ≥ moderate PVR

    Patients with pre-existing pacemakers were excluded from the denominator, n=150.

    §Patients with pre-existing pacemakers were excluded from the denominator, n=589.

    Some patients did not undergo 30-day echocardiographic interpretation by the core laboratory, n=569.

    All-cause mortality

    Close Download
    The JenaValve TrilogyTM Heart Valve System Billing Guide contains appropriate coding (e.g. CPT, ICD-10, and HCPCS), coverage, and payment for procedures performed with the JenaValve TrilogyTM Heart Valve System. For additional information, please contact us at reimbursement.usa@jenavalve.com.